View Single Post
  #7  
Old August 11th, 1999, 08:15 PM
Phil Bramley
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Traditional vs. Continuous

<table border=0 cellpadding=2 cellspacing="0"><tr><td>
<pre>Peter,

Many thanks for that posting.

I wonder how much anti-oxidant end up in the waste pulp? Our machine, a
continuous flow centrifugal process, does not use any extra water and the
waste is separated and diverted out the 'back'. I understand that when
operating the machine (we purchased the machine after this year's harvest)
the trick is to minimise the amount of oil pushed out with the waste.

A friend of ours (invents and manufacturers tree shakers and is working on a
prototype olive shaker) mentioned that the waste is quite flammable and one
must be careful if spreading the waste around olive trees as a mulch.

I read in an Olives Australia newsletter that a large olive waste
re-processing centre had been built in Oman. Do you know anything about it?

Regards

Phil
</pre>
</td></tr></table>

Reply With Quote