|
|||||||
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Members World Map | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Bottling Labeling Promotion & Marketing Label design, market analysis, advertising, market entry and penetration are all discused in this forum. HOW TO and market forcasts are also welcome. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Labels
Greetings, Brian!
I really enjoyed reading your fascinating letter. I cannot believe the abuse to which olive oil has been subjected! You would think it would be ultimately contrary to the IOOC's very mission (and even prosperity). At this rate, this type of dilution of the product, once discovered, will only lead to product avoidance by the public, as there are other oils (perhaps canola, for example) that can step into its shoes (a less exciting alternative, but no less adequate for the ultimate goal of leading the masses away from butter and hardened fats). Hopefully, this trend of "buttering your bread" in the West will cease! Fond regards, Anna >From: tn7685@orvienet.it (Brian Chatterton) >Reply-To: OliveOil@onelist.com >To: OliveOil@onelist.com >Subject: [OliveOil] Labels > > > One of the major problems is the International Olive Oil Council, >based in Madrid, which represents the olive oil producing countries and >controls labelling. They allow labels such as "Pure olive oil" which is one >of the least "pure" olive oils you can buy. It is commonly found in English >speaking countries and is third grade oil below extravergine and vergine. >It has been treated with chemicals to reduce the acidity so is not "pure". >For those not familiar with the labels for olive oil it may seem to be >"more pure" than extravergine or vergine while in fact the opposite is the >case. It is a disgrace that such misleading labels are allowed. > > Another misleading label sanctioned by the IOOC is "Light olive >oil". Elsewhere in the food trade "light" has come to mean less calories >per unit of product. This is usually achieved by adding some so called >"stabilisers" which then allow the manufacture to add heaps of water >without the product collapsing into a liquid or otherwise changing its >character. Olive oil has not been treated in this way (fortunately) and >"light" does not mean less calories but means light in colour and less >flavour. This is hardly surprising as it is third grade oil which has been >chemically treated. The chemical treatment removes all the subtle flavour >and the colour in any case. I have seen chefs on British TV cooking >programs solemnly advising people to use "light" olive oil with the clear >implication that it is even more health because it has less calories. This >is just untrue and a fraud on the consumer. > > A third example is Olivia the margarine that is trying to pretend >it is based on olive oil and is promoted on the health properties of olive >oil. In fact the small print on the back admitts it is mostly canola (rape >seed oil) and has had all the ususal treatment and addition of water >commonly found in margarines. If there are any health properties left after >the treatment and the chemicals it would be a miracle! > > I know that northern Europe, north America, Australia and NZ have >a >deep cultural need to have a "fat" of some sort on their bread but why not >olive oil direct without the mixing with other oils, water, chemicals and >expensive packing and advertising. > >Cheers Brian Chatterton. Last edited by SadounOliveOil : April 27th, 2006 at 11:55 AM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Labels
Things are slightly different here in the US. The IOOC has changed the
labeling laws and now prevents the use of the word, "Pure" next to olive oil. It is now called simply, "Olive Oil". Pure can be used elsewhere on the label but not as part of its name. I am not aware of the IOOC having two sets of labeling standards so it would come as a surprise if these regulations did not apply in the UK. There is no doubt that "Olive Oil" is a notch below Extra Virgin and Virgin. The IOOC goes out of its way to publicize the various grades and definitions of olive oil so any consumer "misperception" that you reference is due to lack of knowledge. In terms of chemical use, Olive Pomace Oil is clearly derived by the use of chemical solvents in the production process. Here in the US, there are very clear labeling regulations regarding Olive Pomace Oil. The word, "Pomace" must be used in the name on the front panel and in a same size font as the word "olive" that precedes it and the word "oil" that follows it. Pure live oil or olive oil is extracted by pressure and high heat and later it is deodorized to remove imperfections. It is a bit misleading to suggest Olive Oil is extracted with the use of chemicals. Which is not say that chemicals aren't used in the entire production process, it is just that they are not used to increase the yield as Olive Pomace oil does. Hope this helps clear up any misperceptions. Last edited by SadounOliveOil : April 27th, 2006 at 11:56 AM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Labels
>Somebody famous once said, "Nobody ever went broke
>underestimating the intelligence of the American consumer". yes, well, this is what happens in countries when there is little or no emphasis on education and people don't 'get out much'. keep that in mind next time your government wants to cut funding for education. you could end up like us ;-) Last edited by SadounOliveOil : April 27th, 2006 at 11:56 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Labels
While we are on the subject of getting rid of "Pure" from the label, can we
do something about "Light". I'm convinced that many people buy Light Olive Oil because they think it is lower in calories (or something) whereas Light (or Lite) refers to the colour. This is designed to mislead. Mike Wilson. Last edited by SadounOliveOil : April 27th, 2006 at 11:56 AM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Labels
Good luck on that one. The most recent change in the labeling law came in
1993 when the Federal government came down on the use of the word, Light. The FDA made the olive oil companies include the words, Light in taste, in close proximity to the words, Extra Light. I believe the regulations state that those qualifiers, Light in taste, had to be at least half the font size and immediately adjacent to Extra Light. Try accusing the big olive oil brands that use this label of intentional deception and they will assert that they are just delivering a milder tasting product that meets the demands of the US consumer. They would call it marketing. Somebody famous once said, "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American consumer". Exhibit "A" might as well be Extra Light Olive Oil. Last edited by SadounOliveOil : April 27th, 2006 at 11:57 AM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Labels
In an effort to educate my community here in Ohio about olive oil, I always
talk to my colleagues and friends about the benefits of olive oil and how to choose the best quality. In the near future (next January) I am planning to give a presentation at my local Kiwanis club about this subject. My presentation will cover the olive tree in general, where it is grown, how olive oil is extracted, the different varieties of olive and olive oil available, and the health benefits of olive oil. It will be in a PowerPoint presentation format including a picture slides show, and possibly a video. If my presentation proves to be successful, I will make it available to other local groups and organizations. If you have any material you would like to share with me that will add value to my presentation, please let me know. Best regards Sadoun Last edited by SadounOliveOil : April 27th, 2006 at 11:57 AM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Labels
Perhaps you are interested in knowing that 22 different varieties can be
found in a single province of Spain. 3 of these varieties are absolutely autochtonous, and other 3, although widespread, original from Malaga. Our findings agree with those of a research group of Israel regarding their local varieties. Gonzalo ================================================== ============== M. Gonzalo CLAROS, Ph.D. claros@uma.es Dpt. Biologia Molecular y Bioquimica claros@cica.es Facultad de Ciencias Fax: (34) 95 213 20 00 Universidad de Malaga E-29071 Malaga (Spain) http://www.nitrogeno.uma.es/FMP/ Last edited by SadounOliveOil : April 27th, 2006 at 11:57 AM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Labels
I would venture a guess and say that the deadly Umbrian contraband makes its
way into a lovely tossed salad, not the East River. By the way, I must commend the sniffer dog for his most excellent taste... Cheers! Anna N.J., USA Last edited by SadounOliveOil : April 27th, 2006 at 11:57 AM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Labels
Dear All,
We have received a mail from a lady who wants some olive oil labels for decoration of her new kitchen. If you are interested in sending her some of your labels please get in touch with her or directly send her some of your labels. Thank you, Haluk of Adatepe Thank you so much for your generosity! That would be wonderful if you would send my letter off to the olive oil email group that you speak of. My address is: 9321 Beaver Meadow Road R. R. # 1 Baltimore, Ontario Canada K0K 1C0 Thanks once again! Kelly Last edited by SadounOliveOil : April 27th, 2006 at 11:58 AM. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
labels
Can any one place on record the correct details for the labelling of olive oil
in bottles that meets the standards for NZ/Aust./America and Europe and that will also meet the requirements for IOOC and EEC. If the NZ or Australian authorities have published this yet. Where would one find this. Publish the reply on this mail group. Thanks RON WATTAM Last edited by SadounOliveOil : April 27th, 2006 at 11:58 AM. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|