|
|||||||
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Members World Map | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| General & Economics Olive farming and economical impact on the farmers and producing countries. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Regional names
<table border=0 cellpadding=2 cellspacing="0"><tr><td>
<pre>Don't worry the concept cannot be applied to Australian olive oil for a long time to come (that is not quite true as I think Mudgee is following through their wine regional name with one for olive oil but I'm not sure). The regional names are controlled by the producers with some government input and they decide whether the oil or wine or vinegar or cheese or ham or whatever is fit to carry the regional name. I'm not sure whether they could call themselves Chianti ( Not regional name) but I doubt it. For Australia there is no traditional base to work from. The system would be impossible. For wine there is a growing traditional base and it would for example be possible to establish a system for the Barossa based on the Shiraz grape. With olives no one has had the experience yet to say the the Hunter or some other regional area of similar climate and soil combines with certain varieties to produce a characteristic oil. Having said that the regional names have enormous problems when they are too successful. One of the most famous is Burgundy. The prices for Burgundy are outrageous but the naming system is frozen as no one is game to touch the goose that lays the golden egg or rather dozens of golden eggs. The same goes for Chianti where many of the best wines are called "Super Tuscan" and have a low classification because they have broken out of the Sangiovese dominance. In Australia there are other problems too. The regional names concept is a mixture of cooperation and competition that is based on the culture. It hardly exists in Britain in spite of European law applying there too. The producers cooperate to promote the regional name but it is not a cooperative and they all sell in competition with each other but realise that it is in none of their interests to degrade the value of the regional name by dumping poor quality product onto the market. In Australia the brand dominates and a doubt whether brand owners would cooperate. It is not impossible as Champagne demonstrates (dominated by large international brands) but unlikely. Cheers Brian Chatterton. </pre> </td></tr></table> |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|