|
|||||||
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Members World Map | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Growing Irrigation and Harvesting Methods Economical harvesting methods and besti practice irrigation methods are important subhjects to our growers. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Manzanillos - Prof Fabbri
<table border=0 cellpadding=2 cellspacing="0"><tr><td>
<pre>Professor Fabbri: Very pleasing to have your comments on our Australian predicament. We believe that this debate on the merits of the Manzanillo for Australian conditions and circumstances is proving very valuable. It's a young industry here, and there has already been much hype expressed about its future. We need a longer view and ongoing research, don't we? Some aspects of our industry are tending to be rather gung-ho, as they say. Around the globe - and certainly in Australia and NZ - there are clearly very stong opinions about the worth of Manzanillo as an oil olive. Recent testing in SA seems to cast doubt on the oil's organoleptic qualities - and its flavour, which is described as bland or ok for blending, yet this flies in the face of what we are informed are winning places for M oil in international comps, big yields etc. How is this so, do you think? Modest yields - or bigger yields of a bland oil extracted by 'lots of tricks' and perhaps because of very ripe fruit - hardly seem the way to go. Certainly not economic if you're trying to run a business; and that's what we are trying to do above and beyond our love for good oil and well pickled fruit, both of which are among life's great joys. The Mediterranean influence on food in this country has been significant and very beneficial, we believe. We note your statement that Manzanillo is not to be chosen for oil. Would you care to explain why. As previously observed, it is being strongly promoted by some here because it is supposed to be good for oil, or at the very least a good dual purpose olive, whatever that really means. Your point is that olives should really be planted for one or the other, isn't it? Another point that has been coming up is reference to various different sub-cv's of Manzanillo. What's known about these? Can they reveal the same DNA, yet have different characteristics as oil or eating olives? In regard to your question about who advised us to 'plant a table olive cv to produce oil', this came from one of Australia's leading nurseries from whom we sought advice as to the best olives to plant for oil. We weren't interested in olives for pickling. Best wishes. Ian & Jenny -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Dear Ian, >nothing can fully explain the failure of your orchard in producing so little >oil, but the concurrence of many negative factors, at least from the scant >information we have. In the first place, who adviced you to plant a table >olive >cv to produce oil? That is the first drawback, but of course the >Manzanillo can >still produce in a range of 14-18% oil, or little less, in the adequate >conditions. Secondly, the orchard is young, and if it rained a lot it may have >concurred in favouring vegetation as a preferrred sink for assimilates. Third, >you harvested about one month earlier than is customary in Cordoba, Spain, in >similar environmental conditions. I would say that, being the conditions >wetter >than in the average andalusian olive orchard, you should have delayed harvest, >rather than anticipate it; this can account for several percentage points, say >up to 8-10. More I can't say, if I don't have more information; certainly, the >orchard is not to be uprooted. If the low productivity continues (say in the >range of 10-12%), you may consider the possibility of topworking with pure oil >cvs. Manzanillo is among the best table cvs in the world, but is not to be >chosen for oil. But 0.1% is really too small a figure to blame the cultivar. > >-- >Prof. Andrea Fabbri >Dipartimento di Biologia Evolutiva e Funzionale >Università di Parma >Parco Area delle Scienze 11/A - 43100 Parma >0521/905974 (905567 Alternative) >0521/905403 Fax > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >TODAY'S FEATURED SITE: http://sadoun.home.att.net/webringform.htm >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >To see more olive related sites visit: http://www.egroups.com/links/OliveOil >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ~~~~~~~ Life is healthier with OliveOil ~~~~~~~ >------------------------------------------------------------------------ </pre> </td></tr></table> |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Manzanillos - Prof Fabbri
<table border=0 cellpadding=2 cellspacing="0"><tr><td>
<pre>>Another point that has been coming up is reference to various different >sub-cv's of Manzanillo. What's known about these? Can they reveal the same >DNA, yet have different characteristics as oil or eating olives? It will appear very soon in the journal Euphitica the analysis of 56 olive-tree cultivars in Malaga (Spain) that correspond to 22 different varieties using molecular markers based in DNA. Among the varieties we have differentiated, you can find Manzanilla sevillana (which is usually called outside Spain 'Manzanillo'), Aloreña (that is also called manzanillo), morisco (also called manzanilla prieta), and zorzaleño (also called manzanillo). You can see the nightmare. All these but morisco are use for table olives, although you can obtain some oil, although the productivity is lower than other varieties. We have seen that olive-tree varieties used for table olives use to cluster in a dendrogram, but we have not determined wich genes are involved in this characteristic. Gonzalo -- ================================================== ============== M. Gonzalo CLAROS, Ph.D. claros@uma.es Dpt. Biologia Molecular y Bioquimica claros@cica.es Facultad de Ciencias Fax: (34) 95 213 20 00 Universidad de Malaga E-29071 Malaga (Spain) http://www.nitrogeno.uma.es/FMP/ </pre> </td></tr></table> |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Manzanillos - Prof Fabbri
<table border=0 cellpadding=2 cellspacing="0"><tr><td>
<pre>I have said: Among the varieties we have differentiated, you can find Manzanilla sevillana (which is usually called outside Spain 'Manzanillo'), Aloreña (that is also called manzanillo), morisco (also called manzanilla prieta), and zorzaleño (also called manzanillo). And I would like to add: I also would like to explain that the name "MAnzanillo" means "small apple" due to the shape of the olives: they are nearly spheric and look like samll apples instead of other more oblong shapes. That's all folks! Gonzalo -- ================================================== ============== M. Gonzalo CLAROS, Ph.D. claros@uma.es Dpt. Biologia Molecular y Bioquimica claros@cica.es Facultad de Ciencias Fax: (34) 95 213 20 00 Universidad de Malaga E-29071 Malaga (Spain) http://www.nitrogeno.uma.es/FMP/ </pre> </td></tr></table> |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Manzanillos - Prof Fabbri
<table border=0 cellpadding=2 cellspacing="0"><tr><td>
<pre>Gonzalo has explained the varietal situation as concerns Manzanilla; I must say that the nightmare is not worse than with many other popular olive cultivars. In Europe we trust traditions, and when a cv. is considered table, we restrain from using it for oil. Being a spanish cultivar, we must let the spaniards speak. They are the first to consider Manzanilla as a table cultivar (not a double purpose), and thus they class it in their books; this means that it is not suited for oil, although of course all olive trees can produce oil. It may be for the low oil content, or for its quality, or both. Even the recent and highly reputed spanish books on olive cultivation agree in considering the cv as a pure table one. Guerrero, Nueva Olivicoltura: “... relatively good production of oil.” Barranco et al., El Cultivo del Olivo: “ ... acceptable oil content.” This means, to me: if you don’t want to pickle, or part of the fruits is too small or damaged, you can still extract oil from the olives. But nobody plants Manzanilla for oil in Spain, or in Italy. That’s why I asked: who adviced you? The problem is that the english speaking world is just that, english speaking, and reading, and does not like other languages; that means that whatever is written in english has an extremely greater audience that what is written in other, namely latin, languages. I am referring to the famous Davis Manual. I am not going to give judgements on it, but I know that from the intentions of its authors it was intended to be a simple and easy to read handbook, based on California conditions and for California growers, rather than a comprehensive and thorough treatise. This can be evinced from the quite quick engagement with many fundamental aspects of olive biology and cultivation techniques. This means that here and there some aspects, being hurriedly dealt with, can be misleading for the average reader. It is the case of Manzanilla as an oil producer. The 20.3 % value comes from and Hartmann et al. booklet, who in turn had this data from other, commercial, sources, which were not his own. In which conditions, what germplasm, what climate, extraction, etc, provided the results were carefully measured? As a matter of fact, to my knowledge, nobody else has reported similar data, also because very few researchers would have found interesting to investigate the oil content of a table cultivar. Even the very recent handbook of Carlo Costa (in english), made for South Africa, indicates oil production of Manzanilla as “medium to low”. I don’t want to appear too parochial, but most of scientifical and technical knowledge on olive is in the Mediterranean, and austral growers should make an effort to scan also the literature and experience that has accumulated here for centuries, although, on our side, we should make our efforts to make available for the english speaking world what we have in store. </pre> </td></tr></table> |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: [Olive Oil] Manzanillos - Prof Fabbri
<table border=0 cellpadding=2 cellspacing="0"><tr><td>
<pre>Group: As one editor of the "famous Davis manual" I need to respond. Prof. Fabbri is quite right - The "Olive Production Manual", published by the University of California, is a publication that was written as a "practical, user's handbook" for new and established olive growers in California's hot, arid climate. There was (and is) no intention for the manual to be or replace in-depth text dealing with the complex physiology or biology of olive - it is for on-farm grower use, not an educational text. As Prof. Fabbri mentioned, it seems that, due to a dearth of other English language publications dealing with practical olive culture, our "Olive Production Manual" is being used as a "stand alone" guide in English speaking areas other than California. As mentioned many times in many locations, California information needs to be used with caution (certainly adjustment) outside of California. This last sentence applies to any distant source of information (including California, Italy, Spain, Israel) - local experience, developed with an understanding of others' knowledge, will ultimately prevail. As far as the cv "Manzanillo" is concerned, California has never considered or recommended this as strictly an oil or dual purpose cv (here or elsewhere) - oil yield is simply to marginal and per acre oil yields cannot compete economically with table fruit revenue from the same yield. For Californians that are interested in strictly oil production, we know about and have suggested "Mission", a cv with a long history for oil and table fruit here. "Mission" is one we know, from our experience growing it for many years, produces fairly good oil yield, has a reasonable oil quality, and can produce (when farmed correctly) fairly good yields. It may not be the best, but it is one we know the most about as to how to grow it and what to expect. Interestingly we, like others, have several foreign experts recommending any number of other oil cvs to potential growers. We will simply have to see how those cvs perform as most of those experts and cvs have no production history or long time experience in California - certainly risky. Having dealt with and developed olives in other countries, I quickly learned that because one cv simply performs well in one country (climatic district) does not mean it will perform in a similar manner, in a different climatic setting elsewhere - indeed, it probably won't. Contrary to popular notion, California has researched olives for table and oil purposes for some time under California conditions. Attached are two items the group should find of interest demonstrating California's history of work on olive cvs and olive oil. All of this said, I have a request if you are not tired of reading. Olive fly, Bactrocera oleae, has been found in the Los Angeles area. We are trying to eliminate it from the olive growing districts of California and, among many other things, have prepared an informational brochure for growers. What we need are good, publication quality slides for the brochure - an adult, larvae and/with larval damage in the fruit, and a female ovipositing. If anyone has such slides they would be willing to share (I don't like sharing slides either), please contact me at: sibbett@lightspeed.net I can pay for FedEx (or the like) posting and return (I will return these). Thanks for any consideration. Steve Sibbett U.C. Farm Advisor Phone - office 559.733.6486 Mobil 559.280.0666 FAX 559.734.2708 -----Original Message----- From: Andrea Fabbri [mailto:fabbri@ipruniv.cce.unipr.it] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 3:56 AM To: OliveOil@egroups.com Subject: Re: [OliveOil] Manzanillos - Prof Fabbri Gonzalo has explained the varietal situation as concerns Manzanilla; I must say that the nightmare is not worse than with many other popular olive cultivars. In Europe we trust traditions, and when a cv. is considered table, we restrain from using it for oil. Being a spanish cultivar, we must let the spaniards speak. They are the first to consider Manzanilla as a table cultivar (not a double purpose), and thus they class it in their books; this means that it is not suited for oil, although of course all olive trees can produce oil. It may be for the low oil content, or for its quality, or both. Even the recent and highly reputed spanish books on olive cultivation agree in considering the cv as a pure table one. Guerrero, Nueva Olivicoltura: "... relatively good production of oil." Barranco et al., El Cultivo del Olivo: " ... acceptable oil content." This means, to me: if you don't want to pickle, or part of the fruits is too small or damaged, you can still extract oil from the olives. But nobody plants Manzanilla for oil in Spain, or in Italy. That's why I asked: who adviced you? The problem is that the english speaking world is just that, english speaking, and reading, and does not like other languages; that means that whatever is written in english has an extremely greater audience that what is written in other, namely latin, languages. I am referring to the famous Davis Manual. I am not going to give judgements on it, but I know that from the intentions of its authors it was intended to be a simple and easy to read handbook, based on California conditions and for California growers, rather than a comprehensive and thorough treatise. This can be evinced from the quite quick engagement with many fundamental aspects of olive biology and cultivation techniques. This means that here and there some aspects, being hurriedly dealt with, can be misleading for the average reader. It is the case of Manzanilla as an oil producer. The 20.3 % value comes from and Hartmann et al. booklet, who in turn had this data from other, commercial, sources, which were not his own. In which conditions, what germplasm, what climate, extraction, etc, provided the results were carefully measured? As a matter of fact, to my knowledge, nobody else has reported similar data, also because very few researchers would have found interesting to investigate the oil content of a table cultivar. Even the very recent handbook of Carlo Costa (in english), made for South Africa, indicates oil production of Manzanilla as "medium to low". I don't want to appear too parochial, but most of scientifical and technical knowledge on olive is in the Mediterranean, and austral growers should make an effort to scan also the literature and experience that has accumulated here for centuries, although, on our side, we should make our efforts to make available for the english speaking world what we have in store. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ You have a voice mail message waiting for you at iHello.com: http://click.egroups.com/1/3555/1/_/137757/_/957866183/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TODAY'S FEATURED SITE: http://sadoun.home.att.net/webringform.htm ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To see more olive related sites visit: http://www.egroups.com/links/OliveOil ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ~~~~~~~ Life is healthier with OliveOil ~~~~~~~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] </pre> </td></tr></table> |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Manzanillos - Prof Fabbri
<table border=0 cellpadding=2 cellspacing="0"><tr><td>
<pre>> Being a spanish cultivar, we must let the spaniards speak. They >are the first to consider Manzanilla as a table cultivar (not a >double purpose), >and thus they class it in their books; this means that it is not >suited for oil, >although of course all olive trees can produce oil. It may be for the low oil >content, or for its quality, or both. As far as I know, cv for table olives are used because the olives can be eaten. If you try to prepare table olives with other cultivars, the taste is no good. Addiotionally, the oil production percentage use to be lower than other varieties (at least in Spain) and the organoleptic properties are not so good than oils prepared with other varieties. However, you can find oil from manzanillo and others in Spain when the production is very high and you have an excess of table olives. >Guerrero, Nueva Olivicoltura: “... relatively good production of >oil.” Barranco et >al., El Cultivo del Olivo: “ ... acceptable oil content.” This >means, to me: if you >don’t want to pickle, or part of the fruits is too small or damaged, >you can still >extract oil from the olives. That's right > But nobody plants Manzanilla for oil in Spain, This is right too. Usually, you can find in old orchards that among the olive-trees for oil, you have one or two trees for table olives that are harvested by the farmer for its own consumption. > It is the case of Manzanilla as an >oil producer. The 20.3 % value comes from and Hartmann et al. booklet, Producers use to say me that the production use to rise the 18% in Spain, while other are over 22% Gonzalo -- ================================================== ============== M. Gonzalo CLAROS, Ph.D. claros@uma.es Dpt. Biologia Molecular y Bioquimica claros@cica.es Facultad de Ciencias Fax: (34) 95 213 20 00 Universidad de Malaga E-29071 Malaga (Spain) http://www.nitrogeno.uma.es/FMP/ </pre> </td></tr></table> |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|