|
|||||||
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Members World Map | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Olive Varieties We know of many varieties that are used for olive pickling only, olive oil only, or a combination. Tell u about the variety you use and how it performing at your location. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
<i>(No subject)</i>
Hi all:
Here are some thoughts to stimulate discussion in reference to the poor oil yields of Manzanillo (i.e. 10% of fresh wt.) being reported in Australia. The cv "Manzanillo" used for table fruit in California is referenced in many publications, as most of you know, as Spanish in origin. Hartmann, in his olive cultivar evaluations of the 40's and 50's includes synonyms for the California Manzanillo as: "Mancanilha" and "Ampoulleau". This probably provides the closest association with the Spanish strain grown here - the latter synonym has southern France association (mentioned in some literature). Average yields in California from good orchards range from 4-5 tons per ac. (9000 kg - 11000 kg/ha). Oil yields at 15% oil (picked earlier than optimum to ensure a crop the following year) = 39.4 gals. per ton or 157.6 - 197 gals/ac., unfortunately still not profitable here if one sells the olives to someone else to process. All of the references I have indicate our Manzanillo here (grown in AZ and CA) yielding between 13% and 25% oil by fresh weight depending on where grown (most samples yielding 19%+ when picked black) - interestingly, 1964 notes that Hartmann made from the olive variety trial at Mildura (Hort. Research Station), state that Manzanillo (I assume from California) "fruits are small and not competitive on the market" but "oil content is good, making it more suited to oil extraction" - I wonder if there are more objective data that were accumulated over the years from this varietal evaluation at Mildura that can be referenced relative to this problem with Manzanillo grown in Australia - this may be where some of the propagating materials for Australian trees came from. Our experiences (and occasional experimental comparisons) here conclude that oil yields are less when olives are grown on flat, heavily irrigated ground. The first report of this (1892) indicates such conditions "tending to produce watery fruit with relatively little oil particularly where ground water was near the surface" (here, under well irrigated conditions, Goldhamer has experimentally proven through a two year cycle of Manzanillo production that deficit irrigation in mid-summer improves oil % with out compromising yield - interestingly 3 out of 4 "California" Manzanillo oil samples from those experiments were in the top five oils determined by a blind tasting in Spain, proving high quality capability, albeit unique in flavor). I have the following comments: 1) No question that the low oil yields are disappointing. However, the best indicator of productivity is liters of oil produced per ha which is a product of fruit yield and oil content. If these are young trees, maybe its to early to draw conclusions about productivity. If the trees are older and fresh production is low, then horticultural attempts to improve productivity are in order. 2) Are the fruits of concern from young, excessively vigorous trees? This might be one reason for low oil yields, which should improve to some extent with age and increasing productivity. 3) Are these trees being overly irrigated (or farmed, e.g. pruned, fertilized etc.)? Again, experiences elsewhere indicate this compromises oil %. (however, its a "fine line" as less farming may compromise fresh yield which, in turn effects total oil yield per ha - be careful here). Start the argument! Steve Sibbett U.C. Farm Advisor Phone - office 559.733.6486 Mobil 559.280.0666 FAX 559.734.2708 Last edited by johnat : May 11th, 2006 at 07:30 AM. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|